The name of Seebeck is something that many stamp collectors and philatelist recognize at some level. He was a stamp dealer and printer, best known for his stamp-printing contracts with several Latin American countries in the late 19th century producing loads of stamps to collector markets.

Last month I started organizing some of my mint / unused South American duplicates for exchange, and I was not surprised that I ended up with something I believe to be Seebeck reprints. As I have for some time build a “side collection” on “Errors, Freaks and oddities on worldwide stamps” (where I accept both mint and used material) these immediately caught my interest (of not giving them away).

1896 Nicaragua - Official stamps. I believe these are Seebeck reprints.

1896 Nicaragua - Official stamps. I believe these are Seebeck reprints.

1896 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps.

1896 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps. Notice the differences in print colors and accuracy (especially 1c value compared to others).

For what I’ve read, the hard part with Seebeck reprints is that there is no easy way to tell apart if the stamps are from the original printing or reprints. Seebeck’s agreement allowed him to use use the original plates for unlimited reprints. For some issues the difference between original and reprint can be told by paper or stamp color, but it’s not a very reliable rule as Seebeck was not very consistent with quality even with the original issues. I asked advice on several forums, and the best answer I got was what I already know – “if it’s unused, then assume a Seebeck reprint”.

1897 Nicaragua - Official stamps. Reprints as well I suppose.

1897 Nicaragua - Official stamps. Reprints as well I suppose.

1897 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps.

1897 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps.

According to Michel, the reprints should have thicker paper and a bit brownish color instead of “brick red”. My problem was of course “compared to what” as I don’t have the originals. After some googling I managed to find a sample of collection from David Feldman auctions (Warning: a very large pdf-file) that helped me in determining some details about the original print colors.

1898 Nicaragua - Official stamps. More Seebeck reprints I believe.

1898 Nicaragua - Official stamps. More Seebeck reprints I believe.

1898 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps.

1898 Nicaragua - Official stamps. A larger view for some of the stamps. Once again, there is a very clear difference in color shade.

Want more?

Sign-up to weekly newsletter and get notified when new articles like the above are published at Stamp Collecting Blog. The email-newsletter is sent to You once a week (during the weekend) and it contains a summary of latest new entries and discussions.

Your email address:

Show that you liked this article - and support Stamp Collecting Blog!

Clicking the Like-button below promotes this article on FaceBook:
Clicking the +1 button below promotes this entry on Google and GooglePlus.

Thanks for your support!

2 Responses to “Seebeck reprints”

  1. I both hate and love these stamps after distinguish the original from reprints is both difficult and a real challenge, I think a good starting is paper and postmarks, I don’t think color will help specially considering red color is easily affected by sunlight.. what about the uv lamp… maybe some differences are seen…

  2. Keijo wrote :

    @Nicolas… AFAIK (identifiable) postmarks are the only reliable way to identify the reprints from real ones. For what I’ve read, it’s another jungle (forgeries etc. fun stuff).
    Otherwise these are to best of my knowledge pretty impossible to categorize properly.

Leave a Reply

Simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before yours appears. Comments should be respectful of other voices in the discussion, and I reserve the right to edit or delete comments at my discretion. Please - do not post buying/selling messages (classified ads) on the user responses as all links and details of Your offers WILL BE REMOVED.

And finally... A small IQ test. Please click the picture that is NOT a postage stamp. Afterwards press the "Submit Comment" button below images.

Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image

Search blog contents

View blog in your language

Latest comments

View more...

Subscribe newsletter

Stay tuned with latest entries on Stamp Collecting Blog. You can choose between a daily RSS feed or weekly email. Click here to subscribe the weekly newsletter.

For chronological listing of all posts, see archives

Tools

Customize the colors of the blog or visit philatelic link directory. Read more...

Show that You Like Stamp Collecting Blog

Clicking the Like-button below promotes this blog on FaceBook:
Clicking the +1 button below promotes this blog on Google and GooglePlus.

Every click counts. Thanks for your support!



For chronological listing of all posts, see archives

All content and images of this blog is under copyright protection; any kind of reproduction or copying of contents without permission is hereby denied. The designs, basic size images of stamps and postmarks are copyright of issuing postal authorities and stamp designers. However all photos of stamps in this blog are enlargements or reductions of original stamps from private collection of Keijo Kortelainen unless otherwise stated, and as such copyrighted photography of © Keijo Kortelainen, 2009-2012. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy
Stamp Collecting Blog's design by © KK Mediat