<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The uggliest miniature sheet ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php</link>
	<description>Amazing true stories from the life of ordinary stamp collector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=388#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Hi James, 

I agree this is a complex issue... Lately I read in the sport news an interesting  tidbit relating to stamps... In the 1990&#039;s Finnish Post wanted to do a stamp/sheet to tribute Keke Rosberg, the first finnish F1-champion.  However, he declined as the Finnish Post was not willing to pay him a sum of 30,000 (marks I suppose) for use of his name and fame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James, </p>
<p>I agree this is a complex issue&#8230; Lately I read in the sport news an interesting  tidbit relating to stamps&#8230; In the 1990&#8217;s Finnish Post wanted to do a stamp/sheet to tribute Keke Rosberg, the first finnish F1-champion.  However, he declined as the Finnish Post was not willing to pay him a sum of 30,000 (marks I suppose) for use of his name and fame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James O</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>James O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=388#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>I think it is standard to have the image of professional racers attached to companies that sponsor them. They are actually required to display. I guess the take of the Finish post was: either we don&#039;t include a picture of the racer, or we include one with the attached sponsors. From this point of view this is not really advertisement on stamps. I doubt Mistubishi or any other company you mentioned paid anything to have their names appear in this bloc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is standard to have the image of professional racers attached to companies that sponsor them. They are actually required to display. I guess the take of the Finish post was: either we don&#8217;t include a picture of the racer, or we include one with the attached sponsors. From this point of view this is not really advertisement on stamps. I doubt Mistubishi or any other company you mentioned paid anything to have their names appear in this bloc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=388#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hi Ian, 

I&#039;d say the beauty (or uggliness) is the eye of the beholder. I think personal opinions and interests also play a major role when it comes to issues such as this.    

For example I like pretty much the 1985 banknote booklet. Most likely because it&#039;s filled with banknotes I&#039;ve either used or collected - ie. I have a level of personal attachment with the topic of issue. The same goes with eurovision sheet.  

As for F1 or rallying, never been interested on topic besides classic/old cars. So most likely my judgement ability is somewhat biased with this case :LOL:  

PS. Nice to see fellow stampboards member reading my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ian, </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the beauty (or uggliness) is the eye of the beholder. I think personal opinions and interests also play a major role when it comes to issues such as this.    </p>
<p>For example I like pretty much the 1985 banknote booklet. Most likely because it&#8217;s filled with banknotes I&#8217;ve either used or collected &#8211; ie. I have a level of personal attachment with the topic of issue. The same goes with eurovision sheet.  </p>
<p>As for F1 or rallying, never been interested on topic besides classic/old cars. So most likely my judgement ability is somewhat biased with this case :LOL:  </p>
<p>PS. Nice to see fellow stampboards member reading my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian - Norvic</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/the-uggliest-miniature-sheet-ever.php#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>ian - Norvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=388#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Surely the Eurovision Song Contest sheet was uglier than this one?  And Finland has a history of overcrowded images on MS and booklets - how about the 1985 banknote printing booklet, the 1996 Friendship booklet ... not quite as bad as Netherlands, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the Eurovision Song Contest sheet was uglier than this one?  And Finland has a history of overcrowded images on MS and booklets &#8211; how about the 1985 banknote printing booklet, the 1996 Friendship booklet &#8230; not quite as bad as Netherlands, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

