<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to create perfect cross-references between Scott, Michel, Stanley Gibbons etc. stamp catalogue &#8211; legally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php</link>
	<description>Amazing true stories from the life of ordinary stamp collector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php#comment-2370</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3085#comment-2370</guid>
		<description>Sounds Ideal in an ideal world. Sadley, need I say more. You all have a great day Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds Ideal in an ideal world. Sadley, need I say more. You all have a great day Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3085#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>@Keijo

Thanks for the further understanding of the WNS. I have only recently become aquainted with that system. Also, thanks for correcting me about the online catalogues. In Michel&#039;s demo version, the search ability is quite limited, but the premium version does have extended search capability for color and denomination in addition to topic and year.

@ian - Norvic

Scott used to list the Machins within the regular postage area of the catalogue so it was less confusing even with the universal &#039;p&#039; denomination since the sets were separated. I don&#039;t recall why they switched the location of the Machins in the catalogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keijo</p>
<p>Thanks for the further understanding of the WNS. I have only recently become aquainted with that system. Also, thanks for correcting me about the online catalogues. In Michel&#8217;s demo version, the search ability is quite limited, but the premium version does have extended search capability for color and denomination in addition to topic and year.</p>
<p>@ian &#8211; Norvic</p>
<p>Scott used to list the Machins within the regular postage area of the catalogue so it was less confusing even with the universal &#8216;p&#8217; denomination since the sets were separated. I don&#8217;t recall why they switched the location of the Machins in the catalogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian - Norvic</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>ian - Norvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3085#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>@David
&quot;GB 1911 1p King George V, scarlet, Die B, perf 12, watermark…&quot;

While Scott insists on denominating pre-decimal GB stamps as &#039;p&#039; there will be confusion.  Scott lists the Machin 1p in two forms (at least).  One is olive the other maroon.  Except that only one has the denomination 1p.  Why does Scott do this to us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David<br />
&#8220;GB 1911 1p King George V, scarlet, Die B, perf 12, watermark…&#8221;</p>
<p>While Scott insists on denominating pre-decimal GB stamps as &#8216;p&#8217; there will be confusion.  Scott lists the Machin 1p in two forms (at least).  One is olive the other maroon.  Except that only one has the denomination 1p.  Why does Scott do this to us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3085#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>@David... The WNS system has been planned as such NOT TO replace stamp catalogue index numbers; nor to be used by collectors. It&#039;s just a tool UPU members, dealers etc. can use to differentiate non-legal issues from legal ones.  Sadly it has never taken off as even UPU member states ignore it completely.  

As for online catalogs, both Michel and SG allow free text search based on issue details.  It&#039;s not perfect, but still very usable (and getting better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David&#8230; The WNS system has been planned as such NOT TO replace stamp catalogue index numbers; nor to be used by collectors. It&#8217;s just a tool UPU members, dealers etc. can use to differentiate non-legal issues from legal ones.  Sadly it has never taken off as even UPU member states ignore it completely.  </p>
<p>As for online catalogs, both Michel and SG allow free text search based on issue details.  It&#8217;s not perfect, but still very usable (and getting better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/stamp-catalog-cross-references.php#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3085#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>The UPU and the WADP have developed a numbering system that is simple and straightforward (only back to 2002).

 http://www.wnsstamps.ch/en/

I have never seen it used nor promoted, but it is a step in your direction. 

If the online catalogues (Michel, SG) would allow for searches using text for issue description and fields for year, perforation, color, etc, then this could push us away from proprietary numbering systems forever. 

Of course, a listing such as, 

GB 1911 1p King George V, scarlet, Die B, perf 12, watermark...

is more expensive than &quot;SG#332&quot; when listing in a dealer ad or an auction title. Abandoning the current system will become necessary at some point, but not until there is a more convenient system for inventory and resale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UPU and the WADP have developed a numbering system that is simple and straightforward (only back to 2002).</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.wnsstamps.ch/en/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnsstamps.ch/en/</a></p>
<p>I have never seen it used nor promoted, but it is a step in your direction. </p>
<p>If the online catalogues (Michel, SG) would allow for searches using text for issue description and fields for year, perforation, color, etc, then this could push us away from proprietary numbering systems forever. </p>
<p>Of course, a listing such as, </p>
<p>GB 1911 1p King George V, scarlet, Die B, perf 12, watermark&#8230;</p>
<p>is more expensive than &#8220;SG#332&#8243; when listing in a dealer ad or an auction title. Abandoning the current system will become necessary at some point, but not until there is a more convenient system for inventory and resale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
