Though Christmas is still far and away, it’s not going to stop me from displaying this nice looking EFO Christmas postage stamp from New Zealand. As usual, the topmost image is of normal item, the latter image displays the freak (with shift of red color).

1962 New Zealand.  The lower stamp has a very noticeable shift of red color.

1962 New Zealand. The lower stamp has a very noticeable shift of red color.

Quite stunning how noticeable difference such a small (few millimeters) color shift can make on design.

Join the discussion on this topic below. There are 16 responses already!

Want more?

Sign-up to weekly newsletter and get notified when new articles like the above are published at Stamp Collecting Blog. The email-newsletter is sent to You once a week (during the weekend) and it contains a summary of latest new entries and discussions.

Your email address:

Show that you liked this article - and support Stamp Collecting Blog!

Clicking the Like-button below promotes this article on FaceBook:
Clicking the +1 button below promotes this entry on Google and GooglePlus.

Thanks for your support!

View blog in your language

Latest comments

View more...

Subscribe newsletter

Stay tuned with latest entries on Stamp Collecting Blog. You can choose between a daily RSS feed or weekly email. Click here to subscribe the weekly newsletter.

Tools

Visit philatelic link directory, view Philatelic Travel Guide, or customize colors of the blog. Read more...

Show that You Like Stamp Collecting Blog

Clicking the Like-button below promotes this blog on FaceBook:
Clicking the +1 button below promotes this blog on Google and GooglePlus.

Every click counts. Thanks for your support!



For chronological listing of all posts, see archives

Join the discussion for “Color shift on NZ 1962 Christmas stamp”

  1. Ronny Wong wrote :

    Nice one u got there… Just curious.. was this a constant flaw?

  2. Keijo wrote :

    @Ronny… This is just of those lucky finds I’ve managed to do.
    As this is a color shift, I’d say this was a single print sheet glitch – nothing permanent. Possibly some blog reader has access to Campbell Paterson’s NZ catalog, and he/she could confirm or rule out my theory.

  3. Catherine Morrison wrote :

    I have in my collection a 1992 45c stamp which has the colour missing on the Bay Stamp. I have had this stamp since it came out in 1992 from the Scenic Booklet Series.
    The Post Mark showing nice and dark and compares well with the other stamps in the series the stamp hasnt any fading nor has it been tampered with in any way (Bleaching) etc and is in good condition. The background is in the base colour Blue showing no other colour then this. Can you please help me with this one.
    Regards Catie.

  4. Keijo wrote :

    Hi Catie,

    as I don’t have access to Campbell Paterson’s NZ catalog I’m pretty much helpless with NZ stamp varieties. AFAIK it is a must have catalog if coming up anything out-of-ordinary with NZ stamps… I did check Pierron’s errors.info (a free and superb resource for commonwealth EFO stamps), but it didn’t list your stamp.

    But that’s all I can say about it… If you can share a picture (=upload a photo of stamp to Photobucket, Flickr or some other free photo sharing website) of item, it would be nice.

  5. mike wrote :

    is it just me or is there also a shift in the blue and yellow as well? is this considered an “error” or a “freak” and what (or whom) defines the difference? (i noticed you call it a freak)
    i have several stamps that exhibit varying degrees of shift but have not been able to determine how they should be properly classified.

  6. Keijo wrote :

    Hi Mike,

    You have good eyes. Yellow is slightly shifted too, but I think it is inside “normal variation” :)

    As for definitions between error and freak (and oddities)… I don’t think there is any official drawing of the line. But if you ask me, a freak is a stamp that is neither normal nor a major error.

  7. David R Tanswell wrote :

    Hello Keijo
    I have the CP Catalogue, and there is NO mention of colour shift on this issue, (CP: SC3A 2 1/2d “Madonna”). In fact, there is only 1 (one) variety, and that is a Flaw on shawl (at left shoulder), Plate 1A, R7/1.. Also, according to the catalogue there are 2 (two) colour varieties.
    1: Black, blue, IVORY & red.
    2: Black, blue, YELLOW & red.

    I also have several copies of the 9d Flag of NZ 1960 Pictorial issue, CP: O10A), where the Red print is in several different positions, more noticeable on the Union Jack section of the flag.
    Hope this is of help and of interest.
    Regards
    David

  8. Keijo wrote :

    Thank You, David.

    This was truly useful. The fact of this being unlisted is IMO a strong indication that my item is a short term freak – not a constant flaw/error. The color variation piece also sounds very interesting; it could very well explain the different looking yellow parts on the above stamps.

  9. anon wrote :

    Small color shift, worth approximately 10 – 20 smackeroos.

  10. Keijo wrote :

    @anon… yikes… I was thinking 1-2$ max….

  11. Peter wrote :

    HI
    I collect pre-decimal NZ and currently live in NZ
    I am currently picking up where i left of as a teen.
    I also use the album easy page maker. so much easier than a GUI based software. Just type some commands, create the page, preview then print.

    Anyway, this website may interest those who also collect NZ.

    cheers
    Peter

  12. Keijo wrote :

    @Peter… That’s one juicy link you’ve found. I just browsed some KGV pages, and there’s plenty of useful information.

  13. Peter wrote :

    another useful link i just discovered.

    http://www.sergent.com.au/stamps/newzealandstamps.html

  14. Keijo wrote :

    Thanks Peter :)

  15. Tony wrote :

    I would agree on the $1-2 as a maximum value. These sort of variations are fairly common in this period. There were ‘painting’ type designs and minor colour shifts tended to get lost in the detail. the 9d pictorial can be spectacular but the red needs to be shifted so that no stars are seen.

  16. Tony wrote :

    I mean that no red is visible in the stars.

Leave a Reply

Simply fill in the form below. All comments are moderated so you may experience a short delay before yours appears. Comments should be respectful of other voices in the discussion, and I reserve the right to edit or delete comments at my discretion. Please - do not post buying/selling messages (classified ads) on the user responses as all links and details of Your offers WILL BE REMOVED.

And finally... A small IQ test. Please click the picture that is NOT a postage stamp. Afterwards press the "Submit Comment" button below images.

Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image

All content and images of this blog is under copyright protection; any kind of reproduction or copying of contents without permission is hereby denied. The designs, basic size images of stamps and postmarks are copyright of issuing postal authorities and stamp designers. However all photos of stamps in this blog are enlargements or reductions of original stamps from private collection of Keijo Kortelainen unless otherwise stated, and as such copyrighted photography of © Keijo Kortelainen, 2009-2012. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy
Stamp Collecting Blog's design by © KK Mediat