Hungarian 1986/1991 definitive series stamps – Castles I
When I wrote shortly about these stamps last week, I had no idea what kind of thrilling research adventure I’d be taken into. I thought I had picked a somewhat simple series to play with for upcoming weekend (as well as for blog topic), but boy I was wrong. I did have a superb weekend when digging up resources and researching stamps from the series. This post contains updated bits and pieces, as well as more detailed information about the series. And then there are plenty of scans from my collection.
Essential basics
The series contains 15 different values from 2ft up to 100ft.

Hungarian Castle definitive stamp series issued in 1986-1991 contains 15 different designs.
Perforations
All values except 3 and 12ft can be found in perforations A (12¼:11½), B (imperf), C (11½:12¼) or D (12¾:12½ ); the 3 and 12ft exist only in A, B or D.
The most complete listing of perforation variants can be found on Hungarian specialized stamp catalog (my compliments to Jay and Tamas for giving me access to this).
Michel does lists mosts perforation variants, but it does omit some. Scott does list even fewer varieties than Michel… Interestingly, all the catalogs give/use slightly different figures/accuracy for perforations.
Papers
Hungarian specialized catalog scans I have, don’t mention about fluorescent fibers, but split the A and C perforated stamps to 3 differently coated papers: glossy, semi-glossy and matt. D stamps exist only in matt coated paper.
Michel does not list paper types specifically, but mentions that stamps from the series are known with normal paper (x) and paper with fluorescent fibers (y). Under UV-lamp the paper with fluorescent fibers looks heavily brownish compared to normal paper (in addition of which it has the glowing fibers scattered all around).
Size
The Hungarian specialized catalogue mentions that future listings may include size variants. Other catalogs don’t mention about these.
Summary table
For my personal record I’ve created (and updated time and again) following summary table which uses Michel numbers, but accumulates pieces of information from other sources as well:
A summary of variants in the series. Items on green background I have, the red ones I need. The ones with orange background should not exist at all, and the ones with white background I'm unaware of(they may or may not exist).
Based on my findings and information so far, I have several open questions relating to paper type. Do C perforated stamp exist other than normal paper? And do D perforated stamps exist only on paper with fluorescent fibers? And do all the values of A perf stamps exist in paper with fluorescent fibers?
Show me some stamps and variants!
Here’s a short photo gallery of items in my current collection. These are all low-resolution scans (to save money and resources with hosting). If anybody wants to have access to high-resolution (600 dpi) scans, please drop in a comment and ask; they are about 36MB of jpg-images.
2ft

Hungary - 2ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
3ft

Hungary - 3ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series. Notice the print flaw.
4ft

Hungary - 4ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
5ft

Hungary - 5ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
6ft

Hungary - 6ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
7ft

Hungary - 7ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
8ft

Hungary - 8ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
10ft

Hungary - 10ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
12ft

Hungary - 12ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
20ft

Hungary - 20ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series. Notice the small variations I've found. Click for larger image.
30ft

Hungary - 30ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
40ft

Hungary - 40ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
50ft

Hungary - 50ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
70ft

Hungary - 70ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
100ft

Hungary - 100ft, from Castles I definitive stamp series.
Closing words
Any comments about the subject are wellcome…Though my weekend (and part of the following week) went quickly with these stamps, I did learn a lot about them. But I’m sure out there are several collectors who have studied these even more; please educate me.
Want more?
Sign-up to weekly newsletter and get notified when new articles like the above are published at Stamp Collecting Blog. The email-newsletter is sent to You once a week (during the weekend) and it contains a summary of latest new entries and discussions.
Show that you liked this article - and support Stamp Collecting Blog!
Clicking the Like-button below promotes this article on FaceBook:
Clicking the +1 button below promotes this entry on Google and GooglePlus.
Thanks for your support!
I liked this article very much. I would like to encourage you to pick up other
“long” definitive series and publish such studies about them.
Best,
Nissim
Hi Nissim,
I definitely would like to do more posts like this, but it may take a (long) while before the next one comes out… Like most bloggers, I maintain the blog on my spare time (for example I’m typing this at 7.45 AM local time), and the next couple of months in my life will be very busy (both work related and personal stuff coming from all directions). Even the (roughly) semi-daily short write ups I’ve been doing may be cut down for a while…
If the blog would support me financially, then things would be different as I could use time and resources to play with stamps and do more posts like this. But with the current situation, it’s very unlikely… Though the blog does have nearly 400 daily readers and over 200 newsletter subcribers, the income from ads/advertisers is peanuts (as advertisers pay only when people click and visit the sites advertised; just displaying the ads doesn’t bring a penny to smalltime website owners like me). Right now the blog pretty much pays up itself, which is a positive issue by itself
But it’s far from being enough to support anyone to do more than random hours for personal fun / pleasure…
Thank you for the informative article.
When i started collecting, i was disappointed when i got a double stamp. Now that i am reading your blogs, i am disappointed that i have not enough double stamps!
@Frank… LOL.