<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identifying the difference between a lithograph and offset print  &#8211; or how I spotted few forgeries on spanish stamps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php</link>
	<description>Amazing true stories from the life of ordinary stamp collector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-6280</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-6280</guid>
		<description>@ .... 
Litho vs. photo on Machin stamps  - I&#039;m sure you have seen this: http://www.adminware.ca/machin/m_var.htm#Printing  
I&#039;m not a specialist with these, but I would rely on AdminWares statement &quot;The easiest place to tell the difference between photogravure and lithographed stamps is in the denomination.&quot;  

I definitely do know what you mean with going blind with magnifier - I just spend few hours looking and identifying various inscriptions on Japanese prefecture / Furusato stamps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ &#8230;.<br />
Litho vs. photo on Machin stamps  &#8211; I&#8217;m sure you have seen this: <a href="http://www.adminware.ca/machin/m_var.htm#Printing" rel="nofollow">http://www.adminware.ca/machin/m_var.htm#Printing</a><br />
I&#8217;m not a specialist with these, but I would rely on AdminWares statement &#8220;The easiest place to tell the difference between photogravure and lithographed stamps is in the denomination.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I definitely do know what you mean with going blind with magnifier &#8211; I just spend few hours looking and identifying various inscriptions on Japanese prefecture / Furusato stamps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrprgrmr</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-6276</link>
		<dc:creator>mrprgrmr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-6276</guid>
		<description>@Charlie, Keijo
This past week, I&#039;ve been going through trying to differentiate my Machins, following the general guidance you described above.  I think I finally found one lithographed yesterday, (confirmed based on the perforations) but I&#039;m uncertain.  The edges and numerals are clean, but the bust looks composed of small dots.  Is this typical of Machins?  I&#039;ve found scans showing the difference between the numerals in photo. and litho. machins on the Internet, but nothing showing a close up of the differences in the bust.  I think I&#039;m going to go blind looking at these through the magnifier... and I&#039;m not even planning to keep any variations other than print type (i.e. phosphor tagging, etc)!  8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie, Keijo<br />
This past week, I&#8217;ve been going through trying to differentiate my Machins, following the general guidance you described above.  I think I finally found one lithographed yesterday, (confirmed based on the perforations) but I&#8217;m uncertain.  The edges and numerals are clean, but the bust looks composed of small dots.  Is this typical of Machins?  I&#8217;ve found scans showing the difference between the numerals in photo. and litho. machins on the Internet, but nothing showing a close up of the differences in the bust.  I think I&#8217;m going to go blind looking at these through the magnifier&#8230; and I&#8217;m not even planning to keep any variations other than print type (i.e. phosphor tagging, etc)!  <img src='http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 03:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>@Charlie... Thanks for sharing the advice / tip :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Charlie&#8230; Thanks for sharing the advice / tip <img src='http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>We have been dealing with Photogravure vs Lithographed stamps in the long never ending Machin series (British Queen Elizabeth II stamps 1967 to date) for  quite a few years.
We advise the collector to look either at the value borders or along the stamps  outer color border. 
Photogravure stamps have a ragged edge where the color lines meet the non-color areas.
Lithographed stamps have a more or less clean edge.
In fact, in many Photogravure issues, where it is important for the specialist to determine whether a stamp was printed from top to bottom or bottom to top, ( or even left to right instead or right to left,) to decide which printing is being examined, we look along the outer edges with a magnifier  and can see the difference in the way the raggety edge is formed.
On Lithographed stamps the direction of printing can not be seen by examining the edges.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been dealing with Photogravure vs Lithographed stamps in the long never ending Machin series (British Queen Elizabeth II stamps 1967 to date) for  quite a few years.<br />
We advise the collector to look either at the value borders or along the stamps  outer color border.<br />
Photogravure stamps have a ragged edge where the color lines meet the non-color areas.<br />
Lithographed stamps have a more or less clean edge.<br />
In fact, in many Photogravure issues, where it is important for the specialist to determine whether a stamp was printed from top to bottom or bottom to top, ( or even left to right instead or right to left,) to decide which printing is being examined, we look along the outer edges with a magnifier  and can see the difference in the way the raggety edge is formed.<br />
On Lithographed stamps the direction of printing can not be seen by examining the edges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-6089</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-6089</guid>
		<description>@Toby... Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Toby&#8230; Thanks <img src='http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

