<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identifying the difference between a lithograph and offset print  &#8211; or how I spotted few forgeries on spanish stamps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php</link>
	<description>Amazing true stories from the life of ordinary stamp collector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keijo</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-1923</link>
		<dc:creator>Keijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-1923</guid>
		<description>In modern offset printing (=photogravure), the dot-pattern is always there as image is build of very tiny dots with different colors (usually CMYK). 


The image is etched using a photographic process (screening) onto the cylinder. This produces rows of dots, which make up the image.  How visible the dots will be on final output, depends on (dot) density (which is usually 150 dots per inch or finer) and ink flow. 

PS. I updated the original article a bit, as I know U.S. and European terminology of printing methods tend to be slightly different.  This is especially confusing as different stamp catalogs use different (and sometimes even contradicting) names for same things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In modern offset printing (=photogravure), the dot-pattern is always there as image is build of very tiny dots with different colors (usually CMYK). </p>
<p>The image is etched using a photographic process (screening) onto the cylinder. This produces rows of dots, which make up the image.  How visible the dots will be on final output, depends on (dot) density (which is usually 150 dots per inch or finer) and ink flow. </p>
<p>PS. I updated the original article a bit, as I know U.S. and European terminology of printing methods tend to be slightly different.  This is especially confusing as different stamp catalogs use different (and sometimes even contradicting) names for same things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/forgeries-of-cheap-spanish-stamps.php#comment-1922</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stampcollectingblog.com/?p=3178#comment-1922</guid>
		<description>Good eye Keijo! 

Do you know how the dot pattern is created? Offset uses a rubber transfer plate/roller so I would expect it to be smooth. Is there a screen or mesh involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good eye Keijo! </p>
<p>Do you know how the dot pattern is created? Offset uses a rubber transfer plate/roller so I would expect it to be smooth. Is there a screen or mesh involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
