SCB Stamp Collecting Blog - the premier resource for exclusive stamp information and news

I was preparing some scans on unwanted (duplicate or mint) items for my stamp exchange website when I noticed few mint Spanish stamps that didn’t seem to fit into picture. The subnotes on stamp catalog confirmed my hunch- I had stumpled upon forgeries of somewhat common and cheap stamps.

The original issues were printed using lithograph (“stone printing”), the forgeries were printed using offset. I know many  collectors struggle with how to tell these apart  – especially if having nothing to compare with.  In reality the difference is quite easy to spot if you know what to look for.

First, here’s a real stamp printed in litho. A lithograph print will ALWAYS have a solid outlines and fills. The print impression is flat with no notable indentations differentiating design from paper/non-printed areas (both front and back feel flat/smooth when you when you touch it with fingertips).

Lithography - borders and fills are clear + solid. No dot pattern visible.

Lithography - borders and fills are clear + solid. No dot pattern visible.

And here’s the forgery printed in offset. Especially post 1920’s stamps offset means that stamp is printed using photogravure. The characteristics for this are simple, as the impression ALWAYS shows lines of dots (or beads) when looked at proper (at least 10x) magnification. The dots will be visible on both the outlines and fills. The resulting impression is generally unclear and flat when compared to litho:

Offset - the print is somewhat unclear. Offset has always somewhat visible dots of color.

Offset - the print is somewhat unclear and there is always a somewhat visible dot pattern.

Instead of going to trade, the forgeries ended up into my collection.

You might also be interested of related posts about , .

Subscribe to free newsletter

Click here to subscribe the weekly newsletterSign-up to SCB newsletter and get notified when new articles like the above are published at Stamp Collecting Blog. The email-newsletter is sent to Your inbox one to four times a month, and it contains a summary of new entries and discussions on the blog, as well as a short behind the scenes editorial.

Your email address:

There are 13 responses for this entry, click to read the responses.

Leave a new response

All responses are moderated before publishing. Responses should be respectful of other voices in the discussion and remain on topic. All buy/sell messages will be deleted, as well as questions about stamp values (you can always get yourself a stamp catalog from public library, or get your stamps valued). If You want to share an picture/photo, use the Insert image option below. Please share only images of items that you own/have in your collection. reserves the right to edit or delete comments that violate these policies.

And finally... A small IQ test. Please click the picture that is NOT a postage stamp. Then press the "Submit Comment" button below images.

Stamp imageStamp imageStamp imageStamp image

All original content and images of this blog is under copyright protection; any kind of reproduction of full contents without permission of the owner is hereby denied. All Rights Reserved © Keijo Kortelainen, 2009-2016. All photos of stamps in this blog are enlargements or reductions of original stamps from private collection of author of the blog (unless otherwise stated). The designs of stamps and postmarks are copyright of issuing postal authorities and their designers. The comments / discussion on this blog are copyright of their retrospective authors, and represent the opinion of their authors. When submitting content of any type to this Website, you agree that you assign to this Website and its successors perpetual and unlimited license free of charge to host, store, publish, reproduce, publicly display or otherwise use any content and materials of any type provided or contributed by You. Catalog numbers (Scott, Michel, SG etc) are the copyrighted property of their publishers. | See our privacy policy