Some Chinese stamps - cancellation forgeries or something else?

» Email » Print
» Add comment

These days stamps don't get me confused often, but the below Chinese stamps have done that. These are from the same lot as the Japanese Taxe Percue cut squares I wrote few weeks back. The stamps are ok, but the cancellations... I've got a nasty gut feeling I've landed with a pile of cancellation forgeries on common Chinese stamps.

Common Chinese stamps from late 1940s.  But what's up with cancellation? I've never seen a cancellation like this on Chinese stamps.

Common Chinese stamps from late 1940s. But what's up with cancellation? I've never seen a cancellation like this on Chinese stamps.

At first I thought these could be some kind of revenue cancellations, but Googling around showed me that Chinese revenue items rarely have any western numbers on cancellations. And not a single revenue item I found had postage due stamp attached; I've got several of them canceled in similar style (see below image for example).

Some more Chinese stamps with similar cancellation. Notice there's also an postage due stamp (2nd on top row).

Some more Chinese stamps with similar cancellation. Notice there's also an postage due stamp (2nd on top row).

These look a lot like someone used or played around with date stamper. I don't know if these could be some sort of railway or TPO (Traveling Post Office) markings, or from postal savings documents etc. where date stampers might have been used... A common nominator seems to be that all the items are roughly the same era: from late 1940s up to early 1950s. I've got maybe 70-80 stamps all canceled in similar fashion.

And they're not all just small definitives. Here's Northeast China Mi#144 and  PRC Mi#144.

And they're not all just small definitives. Here's Northeast China Mi#144 and PRC Mi#144.

Any help and opinions for solving this mystery would be highly appreciated. Are these forgeries, or something else?

You might also be interested of related posts about , , .

Show that you liked this article

Support the blog - become a premium member for 12.40€!

By joining Stamp Collecting Blog Premium membership programme, You can support this blog and quarantee that articles like this (and 300+ others already available) remain freely accessible to every stamp collector. Additionally, you can download some of the blog contents as downloadable eBooks (pdf) and You can opt out of ads for period of one year. Read more and sign up now!

Subscribe to free newsletter

Click here to subscribe the weekly newsletterSign-up to SCB newsletter and get notified when new articles like the above are published at Stamp Collecting Blog. The email-newsletter is sent to Your inbox one to four times a month, and it contains a summary of new entries and discussions on the blog.

Your email address:


There are 18 responses for this entry, click to read the responses.

Leave a new response

Doubleclick here and type your response...

All responses are moderated before publishing. Responses should be respectful of other voices in the discussion, and remain on topic (all buy/sell messages will be deleted). Stampcollectingblog.com reserves the right to edit or delete comments that violate these policies. If You want to share an picture/photo, simply write the entire URL of the photo in the comments field.

And finally... A small IQ test. Please click the picture that is NOT a postage stamp. Then press the "Submit Comment" button below images.

Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image Stamp image

All original content and images of this blog is under copyright protection; any kind of reproduction of full contents without permission of the owner is hereby denied. All Rights Reserved © Keijo Kortelainen, 2009-2014. All photos of stamps in this blog are enlargements or reductions of original stamps from private collection of author of the blog (unless otherwise stated). The designs of stamps and postmarks are copyright of issuing postal authorities and their designers. The comments / discussion on this blog are copyright of their retrospective authors, and represent the opinion of their authors. Catalog numbers (Scott, Michel, SG etc) are the copyrighted property of their publishers. | See our privacy policy